Garmin Forerunner 170 vs COROS Pace 4

The COROS Pace 4 puts more of its value into training. The Garmin Forerunner 170 gives you more beyond the run.

Both are lightweight running watches with AMOLED displays, structured workouts, wrist-based running power, recovery data and the tools needed for anything from a first 10K to marathon training.

The main differences are simpler than the feature lists make them look. COROS offers longer battery life, dual-frequency GPS and a more focused training experience for less money. Garmin adds contactless payments, deeper health tracking, more customisation and a wider range of everyday features.

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs COROS Pace 4: Quick Comparison

What Is the Main Difference?

The Pace 4 keeps more of its value in battery life, GPS and training tools. The Forerunner 170 spreads its feature set further, adding payments, broader health tracking, more sports profiles and greater customisation.

Both watches cover running, cycling, swimming and multisport training, so there is not much between them on basic sports support. The clearer question is whether you want a focused training watch or a running watch that does more across the rest of the day.

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs COROS Pace 4 Specs

Where the Garmin Forerunner 170 Stands Out

The Forerunner 170 does more once the run is saved. Garmin Connect brings training, sleep, stress, recovery and daily activity together, while Training Readiness turns recent load, sleep and recovery into one score.

Garmin Pay is useful for running without a wallet, while Garmin also offers more freedom to customise screens, widgets and watch faces.

The Forerunner 170 is not limited to running either. It includes more than 80 sports profiles, giving it plenty of scope for runners who also cycle, swim, strength train or mix several sports into the week.

That makes the Garmin easier to justify if it will stay on your wrist all day, not just during training.

Where the COROS Pace 4 Stands Out

The Pace 4 keeps its focus tighter. Recent sessions, weekly load, recovery and upcoming workouts are easy to find, while the Training Hub helps runners build sessions and review a full training block.

Its clearest advantages are dual-frequency GPS and considerably longer battery life. That makes it particularly strong for marathon blocks, high-mileage weeks, race travel and runners who do not want to charge their watch every few days.

Both watches support multisport training, so that is not a major dividing line here. COROS stands out more through its battery figures, lighter design and the way the watch and app keep the focus close to training.

You lose contactless payments and some of Garmin's wider health and smart features, but little that changes the run itself.

Which Watch Has Better GPS?

The COROS Pace 4 has the stronger GPS specification because it includes dual-frequency tracking. That can help on routes around tall buildings, through dense tree cover or anywhere satellite reception is less straightforward.

The Forerunner 170 uses all-systems GNSS rather than the multi-band mode found on more expensive Garmin watches. For open roads, parks and normal training routes, both offer the pace, distance and navigation data most runners need.

For harder sessions, hills or colder weather, an external heart-rate monitor may still give more dependable readings than wrist-based tracking on either watch.

Which Watch Has Better Battery Life?

COROS has the clear advantage.

Actual results depend on display settings, notifications and training frequency, but the Pace 4 remains the better option for high-mileage weeks, race travel and anyone who wants to charge less often.

Garmin Connect vs the COROS App

Garmin Connect gives you more data. The COROS app gets to the running data quicker.

Garmin suits runners who want training, recovery, sleep, stress and wider health information in one place. It offers more depth, although it can take longer to work out which parts you will actually use.

COROS is easier to navigate if the priority is recent workouts, training load, recovery and the next session. The Training Hub also makes it easier to build workouts and review a full block on a larger screen.

Is the Garmin Forerunner 170 Worth the Extra Money?

It is worth paying more when Garmin Pay, Training Readiness, deeper health tracking, broader sports support and greater customisation are features you will actually use.

The Pace 4 gives runners longer battery life, dual-frequency GPS and the main training tools for less money.

Do not choose the Garmin simply because it has more features. Choose it because the features missing from the COROS matter to you.

Which Running Watch Suits You?

The Key Difference

The Pace 4 makes more sense when battery life, dual-frequency GPS and focused training tools come first. The Forerunner 170 earns its higher price through Garmin Pay, health tracking, broader sports support and wider everyday use.

Both cover running and multisport training well. Look at the features you will use between sessions, because that is where the real difference sits.

Shop Garmin and COROS Running Watches

Explore Garmin and COROS running watches at Pro:Direct Running and find the model that fits the way you train and use your watch beyond the run.